Right of Reply: Olusegun Adeniyi’s Trip To Babel By Reuben Abati
Jonathan |
There has
been an organized and consistent attempt by a certain section of the political
class and the Nigerian commentariat to water down the historical impact of
President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan’s decision to concede victory to
President-elect Muhammadu Buhari ahead of the final tally in the 2015
Presidential election. Those who have engaged in this enterprise are unkind, if
not callous, insincere, if not cruel.
Their
tactics, which range from the dubious to the mischievous, have included a
desperate attempt to push the story that President Jonathan would not be the
first African leader to concede victory in an election, or that he is certainly
not the first Nigerian President to do so. The second claim has been
effectively dismissed with historical facts, and as for the former, in a
continent where sit-tightism remains a threat to democratic consolidation, and
elections in many places are seen as mere rituals for keeping the monarch in power
till death do them part, no informed student of the subject will deny the truth
that President Jonathan’s conduct is definitely an act of statesmanship and
heroism, and that President Jonathan deserves all the recognition, the
accolades, applause and vastly elevated moral stature that has come with that
singular act.
By his very
unusual and highly symbolic act of graceful concession, President Jonathan
snatched glorious victory from the jaws of seeming defeat. He outsmarted his
traducers and became overnight, a hero of global proponents of true democracy
in Africa. While many of his opponents seemed obsessed with power at all costs
and by all means possible, by calling General Buhari to concede victory,
President Jonathan fully lived up to his often stated conviction that the
country is more important than individual ambitions and that leadership should
be more about sacrifice than the pursuit of self-interest.
Some had
threatened that he would end up like Cote d’Ivoire’s Laurent Gbagbo. He proved
to be a much better student of history. They promised that if his electoral
defeat which they had dictated as an inevitability did not come to pass, they
will instigate chaos and confusion, form a parallel government and make Nigeria
ungovernable, hang it all on his head and send him to the International
Criminal Court. In the end, he short-circuited their conspiracy, and showed
that he belongs to a global hall of honour, not infamy.
Ahead of the
2015 Presidential election, many Nigerians had scampered to their ancestral,
ethnic safety zones in fear, while the better circumstanced sought safety in
self-imposed temporary exile, to watch the homeland from a distance until
things settled. One man’s act of courage and patriotism changed all that. He
defied the same stereotypes which curiously are being reinforced in some
African countries, and created a special moment for Nigeria and Africa. This is
perhaps the more enduring location of President Jonathan’s legacy: his vote for
peace and national stability.
We
need to keep repeating this, especially as those who feel cheated and hurt by
President Jonathan’s winning in losing, seem determined before our very eyes,
to revise a less than six-week old narrative. With their first two claims
dismissed as vacuous and even irrelevant to the point, they are now recruiting
pens and mouths for a new leg of their narrative. The most telling in this
regard has been Olusegun Adeniyi’s “Inside the PDP Tower of Babel” (THISDAY,
May 7, back page). Adeniyi’s indicated purpose is to review the politics of the
PDP in the context of the ruling party’s defeat in the 2015 General elections,
but for the most part, he seeks to portray President Jonathan as duplicitous
and hypocritical.
Adeniyi’s
claims and insinuations are informed by a meeting he claimed took place at the
new Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa, “on Tuesday, 30th March
2015,”- he probably meant Tuesday, 31st March 2015- that
historic day when President Jonathan raised the moral level of Nigerian
politics. Adeniyi was not at the meeting, so we can safely assume that his
entire rendition is based on hearsay. If he insists that he heard his tale on
“good authority”, then that would be suspicious because Olusegun Adeniyi, who
has been in the corridors of power at significant moments, and has written two
books on the subject – ‘The Last 100 Days of Abacha’ (2005) and ‘Power,
Politics and Death’ (2011), ought to know that Nigerian politics is a
seething vortex of intrigues, angle-shooting, complex conspiracies and crass
opportunism.
Adeniyi may
have unwittingly allowed himself to be misled, indeed, he may need to ask his
sources playing the role of “Aso Villa spies” for their recorder, and listen
more carefully. As it is, his reportage is pure fabrication intended to
unjustly discredit the President and promote other vested interests within the
polity.
I begin with
the third paragraph of his piece: “The atmosphere at the meeting was sombre…”,
he writes. How can Adeniyi be so sure of the texture of an atmosphere he never
experienced? He adds: “…without much preamble, President Jonathan announced:
“Gentlemen…” Sorry, Segun. It is not President Jonathan’s style to open any
meeting at all with the phrase: “Gentlemen…” He is more likely to observe the
protocol list.
What then
follows is a long quote, meant to be President Jonathan’s charge to the
meeting: “…about an hour ago, I called General Buhari to concede and to
congratulate him. But I did that not because the PDP lost the election but
rather to calm the nation, as many people advised me to do so. Even when I
conceded to allow the nation move forward, the information at my disposal is
that the election has been massively rigged and INEC is complicit. While I have
done my bit as a statesman, I believe the party should put out a strong statement
to reject the result and that the PDP will challenge it in court. I think the
National Publicity Secretary of the party should do that.”
These words
which Adeniyi attributes to President Jonathan are not his, nor do they reflect
his style or thought process. He never uttered those words.
In the
seventh paragraph, Adeniyi goes ahead to offer what seems to be a verbatim
report of conversations between Godswill Akpabio, Liyel Imoke and Adamu Muazu
in the privacy of the latter’s house! Does he have spies in Muazu’s house? If
not, then definitely, one of the three gentlemen must be his shameless kiss and
tell source? Will he be willing to tell us who this is? No, he won’t because he
can’t. A few paragraphs later, Adeniyi further writes somewhat gleefully that
“the President may be meeting his match in Muazu”, and states that “it tells a
compelling story of its own that Muazu is the 6th PDP Chairman
under Jonathan, all within a period of five years.”
Adeniyi’s
bias is undisguised; his construction of a duel is curious, but he would still
need to tell the accurate story of the circumstances that led to the exit of
the former Chairmen of the Peoples Democratic Party in the past five years.
Contrary to his insinuations, they were not removed by President Jonathan.
Okwesilieze Nwodo was removed by a court of law due to local Enugu state
politics. Dr Haliru Bello who served as Acting Chairman after him was later
appointed Minister of Defence in 2011. Alhaji Abubakar Baraje succeeded Bello
also in acting capacity to complete Nwodo’s aborted tenure. The story of the
exit of Vincent Ogbulafor and Bamanga Tukur equally has nothing to do with the
President.
I can
go through the rest of Adeniyi’s story-telling to point out other
inconsistencies and give-aways. Reading between the lines, it should not be too
difficult in the light of recent altercations among PDP chieftains about who
did what and who received and disbursed what money during the election
campaigns to know the kind of conspiracies at work. In making a story out of
the melodrama, however, Olusegun Adeniyi should have resisted taking a trip of
his own to Babel.
The meeting
that he refers to took place at least five hours after President Jonathan had
congratulated General Buhari, “not one hour ago,” as he claims. By then, words
of admiration and commendation for his gallantry had flooded the airwaves. The
President did not need to be persuaded to take that decision. He had always
made it clear that his ambition is not worth the blood of any Nigerian. As he
himself has pointed out, he took the decision in the interest of national
unity, peace and stability and to prevent any form of post-election violence.
The
President could see through the traps that had been laid for him; at that
moment he was already fully aware of the extent of the network of sabotage and
conspiracies, internal and external, contrived and inflicted, that wrong-footed
the PDP during the elections. Many party leaders started rushing to the
Villa after hearing what the President had done. They were caught unawares. He
had absolutely no reason to ask the party to reject the results of the
Presidential election. And he never did. He had made up his mind to let it go.
By the morning of April 1, he was already packing his things out of the
Presidential Villa, satisfied that he had done the right thing by preventing a
much predicted ethnic, religious and political violence.
Olusegun
Adeniyi therefore got it all wrong. But not done with his trip to Babel, he is
also threatening to write a book to be titled: ‘Against the Run of Play: How
an Incumbent President was Defeated in Nigeria’. He certainly owes us an
obligation to declare early enough if that is intended to be a work of fiction
and hearsay. The People’s Democratic Party which lost power suddenly at the
centre, after 16 years in the saddle, is obviously undergoing a post-defeat
trauma. Discrediting President Jonathan, with dubious story-telling, should not
be part of that crisis.
· Dr
Abati is President Jonathan’s Spokesman and Special Adviser, Media and
Publicity.
Comments
Post a Comment